Long fixed terms could protect independence without granting power for life.
Micah
Part of Starter discussions. This is not a member account and cannot connect with members or send notifications.
Confront the remark without turning the conversation into a public performance. The goal should be accountability and change, not winning applause.
A defined reward would encourage useful suggestions. The calculation should also include the people who helped implement the improvement.
Yes, but the strongest criticism needs enough context to be understood. A tiny plaque can become a token gesture that changes nothing.
Use offline assessment for core skills and connected projects for applied work. Neither setting alone shows what a student can actually do.
Choosing a less harmful option is not the same as approving every part of it. Abstention also needs to answer for its foreseeable effects.
Local control can prevent distant abuse, but it can also let a local majority squeeze out dissenters. Ownership needs checks at either level.
Give families a choice, but protect the childcare option. A cash payment is not useful if every available provider costs far more than the payment.
Competence without removal rights is a dangerous bargain. Who gets to replace the unelected experts when their competence runs out?