Starter discussions

Should app stores be allowed to control which software users install? Central review can support safety while limiting competition and individual control over devices.

Should addictive digital design be regulated like other consumer risks? Protective rules need a workable distinction between engaging products and manipulative behavior.

Should smartphones be designed to discourage use rather than maximize engagement? User wellbeing may conflict with business models that depend on sustained attention.

Should social platforms require parental permission for teenagers? Protection matters, but universal permission rules may restrict access to support and information.

Should people be paid whenever companies profit from their personal data? Payment recognizes value, but it may normalize practices that remain intrusive or difficult to refuse.

Should targeted advertising based on personal behavior be banned? Relevant ads can fund services while encouraging broad collection of information people barely understand.

Should data brokers be prohibited from selling location histories? Commercial utility must be weighed against how revealing movement patterns can become.

Should the right to be forgotten apply to truthful news reporting? Privacy and rehabilitation can conflict with maintaining an accurate public record.

Should children have a right to erase posts their parents made about them? Family expression can create a digital identity before the person affected can participate in the decision.

Should smart-home devices keep recordings unless users actively delete them? Convenience and product improvement compete with clear consent and control over intimate data.

Should parents track an adult child's location if they pay the phone bill? Financial support does not automatically settle the boundaries of an adult's privacy.

Should workplaces monitor employees through screenshots and keystrokes? Oversight can become intrusive when activity metrics substitute for trust and actual performance.