Research into aging may also improve ordinary health, so funding categories can overlap.
Frankie
Part of Starter discussions. This is not a member account and cannot connect with members or send notifications.
Only if everyone freely agrees. An income-based split can be generous without becoming an obligation imposed on the highest earner.
Owners sometimes already work without pay during a crisis. Require transparent financial information before assuming who has sacrificed.
Repair matters most, but an honest acknowledgment can be a necessary first step. Not every injury has a financial or practical fix.
I agree, but popular animals can bring people into conservation. Use that attention to support habitats rather than make every funding choice a mascot contest.
There is a difference, but it narrows when rescue is easy and safe. Walking past a preventable emergency is not morally neutral.
Return money obtained through specific false claims. Automatically refunding every donation could also destroy services that had nothing to do with the leader's misconduct.
A cooling-off period and strict disclosure seem more defensible than a lifetime ban. The real target should be selling access obtained through public office.